Difference between revisions of "User talk:Seb26"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Team Fortress Wiki:Reports/Long redirects: new section)
(Class Bio: "Beta" linkage.: new section)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
Is this really necessary? {{n}} [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family:'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic Eric</b></span>]] <small> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</small> 09:13, 2 December 2011 (PST)
 
Is this really necessary? {{n}} [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family:'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic Eric</b></span>]] <small> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</small> 09:13, 2 December 2011 (PST)
 +
 +
== Class Bio: "Beta" linkage. ==
 +
 +
Don't you think that linking players to the TF2 Open Beta might mislead them to believe that those former emblems ''(that were used in early iterations of TF2)'' are actually in the open beta? I think no linkage would be the best, unless you have a better term than "Beta" that would be more descriptive for these unused/beta/early iteration emblems. '''[[User:404 User Not Found|404: User Not Found]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:404_User_Not_Found|(talk)]]</sup> 02:06, 9 December 2011 (PST)

Revision as of 10:06, 9 December 2011


Team Fortress Wiki:Reports/Long redirects

Is this really necessary?  –  Epic Eric (T | C) 09:13, 2 December 2011 (PST)

Class Bio: "Beta" linkage.

Don't you think that linking players to the TF2 Open Beta might mislead them to believe that those former emblems (that were used in early iterations of TF2) are actually in the open beta? I think no linkage would be the best, unless you have a better term than "Beta" that would be more descriptive for these unused/beta/early iteration emblems. 404: User Not Found (talk) 02:06, 9 December 2011 (PST)