Team Fortress Wiki:Featured articles

From Team Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 01:11, 7 November 2011 by Cructo (talk | contribs) (Baleful Beacon)
Jump to: navigation, search

Featured articles

Featured articles exemplify some of the best written and most informational articles on Team Fortress Wiki. Featured articles must adhere to the featured article criteria below.

Featured articles are determined and rotated by the staff.

Criteria

  1. A featured article is—
    • informative: it should contain both helpful and useful information;
    • comprehensive: it should be complete, without omission of major facts or details;
    • accurate: it should be factually accurate, and sourced where appropriate.
  2. It should also be—
    • well-written: the prose of the article is engaging, and of a professional standard;
    • properly styled: the article should follow all conventions in the Style guide;
    • stable: the article should not be currently undergoing any major revisions or edit wars;
    • of appropriate length: the article should stay focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail.
  3. Its use of media should be—
    • referential: images should be used as a source of reference;
    • to clarify: images should be used to help illustrate a point;
    • informational: images should be used to display additional information.
    • Media used on a featured article must be appropriately licensed and include source information on the file description page.
  4. A featured article must also be—
    • well-connected:
      • by linking to all relevant articles;
      • by linking to reliable outside sources where appropriate.

Current featured articles

Achieved.png

Nomination procedure

To nominate an article—

  1. Ensure that the article meets the criteria.
  2. Add a new section to the Current nominations section below, and include a link to the article and a statement from you about it.
  3. Add {{Featured article candidate}} to the talk page of the article.

Anyone is free to nominate any article they consider to meet the featured criteria.

Current nominations

Headless Horseless Horseman

I nominate the HHH as it is informitive, interesting, and goes by the required set of rules for a featured article. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sandvich Heavinski (talk) • (contribs) 23:32, 14 January 2011

Probably not the best idea since it is quite cluttered and in need of a cleanup.--Focusknock 23:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Bonk! Atomic Punch

The Bonk! Atomic Punch page is pretty full. I did a bit of sprucing up on it this morning, and it doesn't look half bad, I think. Not to say it looked bad before, it was just a good before! But now it's like, super good. It's got trivia for the nerds and bugs for people to mack fun of, too! And get a load of that thick, juicy update history. Don't even get me started on crafting! This article is pretty much, in my opinion, the weapon article. SilverHammer 23:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support While it's not the most relevant of articles at this time, I must admit that it is a very good written article. I would fully support it being a Featured Article. TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss 20:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support A very fun wep and a nice page.-- RRaccoon99 19:53, 4 November 2011 (PDT)

Item quality

It's informative and well written, and it's also relevant. I don't see why not.  – User Ohyeahcrucz Sig.png Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 21:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support A good article to feature in the future --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 14:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Meet the Team

I would like to nominate the Meet the Team page. Why? Because it can kick your ass; I know it kicked mine. That's just how good it is. So why waste time listening to a mortal such as myself explain it? Check it out yourself. Killicon splendid screen.pngTheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss 03:48, 7 July 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support While your methods of nominating this article are.. questionable. It is a nice page to show off --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 14:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support It is indeed a good page.  – User Ohyeahcrucz Sig.png Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:11, 23 June 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram neutral.png Neutral Er. --SilverHammer 22:12, 1 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Good page with a lot of great media. --_Sp3cTalk 21:10, 7 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram neutral.png Neutral We already kind of... Well, y'know, LINK to the page on the front page of the Wiki. Not much need to feature it below said link. Triscuitable 20:07, 9 September 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support It is a very nice page. I'm ok with it.--RRaccoon99 19:52, 4 November 2011 (PDT)

Comics

Honestly surprised this wasn't already here. I was about to leave a note on the discussion page about how BEAUTIFUL it is. Whoever put it together... the Saxton in the quote, the "cover" links... It's just a beautiful article. Deserves to be seen. SilverHammer 01:32, 5 July 2011 (PDT)

Definately agreed. I believe we have Aperture AI to thank for the design --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 09:07, 7 July 2011 (PDT)
Just to throw this out there; with that big Valve comic being released next month, I think it'd be a good excuse to feature this article, with the cover of that comic on the front page. --SilverHammer 22:02, 17 October 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support I was truly suprised this wasn't in the index. I'll support the full way. -- RRaccoon99 19:55, 4 November 2011 (PDT)

Dr. Grordbort's Victory Pack

I Believe that the featured article should be about the current update, And when there hasn't been any updates for a while, It can then be a completely different article. I'm sure this has been brought up before but I'm just putting it out there. Ihasnotomato

Pictogram minus.png Disagree It's too recent (hence the recent addition template) and too small. Also, sign your posts with ~~~~ instead of manually entering a link to your userpage.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 05:05, 22 July 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram minus.png Disagree Too short. Notice that the TF2 blog post is actually longer than the explanatory text itself. EuphoriA 22:10, 1 August 2011 (PDT)

Medieval_Mode

I am nominating the Medieval Mode page as it is well written, contains a good amount of informative information, and last but not least, is very funny in my opinion. --Sp3ctr3 23:42, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support Good article, very well written and informative. PhantomLimb 18:06, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support A surprisingly well done article. The number of chat replacements is simply priceless --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Very popular game mode so it would be helpful. MaxMan1300 14:11, 6 October 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram neutral.png Neutral I liked the idea. But, It was doomed from the start and i found the gameplay quite annoying because It was manly for demoknights. Good idea, but bad Gameplay and It was made for ONE class.--RRaccoon99 19:49, 4 November 2011 (PDT)

Trading

Trading has become a major aspect of TF2, and remains a mechanic that a lot of players, especially Free to Play players, don't really understand. This article is well written, concise, and contains a lot of useful and relevant information. I think it would be a fantastic featured article. EuphoriA 22:03, 1 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support It could use a little cleaning, but I generally agree with what you said. --SilverHammer 22:12, 1 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Agreed, could be helpful to new users --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram minus.png Disagree I don't think it's good enough for featuring, yet.  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 14:41, 16 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram minus.png Disagree In light of recent vents, I am inclined to redact my original agree until the article is in better condition. --SilverHammer 22:21, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

Holiday cards

It's small, there's very little information, very few links, but damned if it won't be a cute article to have on the front page in December. Getting it in the system early c: --SilverHammer 22:07, 4 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram minus.png Disagree Too small, too few info, not relevant enough; these may change if some dedicates part of their time to improve it, but not good enough to be featured yet.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 10:13, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram minus.png Disagree There's not much information on the page, and it's not timely, if it were November, it might be different, but it's August. --_Sp3cTalk 21:09, 7 August 2011 (PDT)

Did you read what I wrote, Sp3c? Specifically, "but damned if it won't be a cute article to have on the front page in December. Getting it in the system early"? --SilverHammer 11:41, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram comment.png Comment Could use a bit of work, it's quite simple right now. Not sure what else could go on it though. --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)

First Annual Saxxy Awards

I think that this is worthy of being nominated for a Featured Article because:
- It is formatted well.
- It is informative on the categories and who won each of them.
- Gives new users insight into the Team Fortress 2 Community.
- The links are correct.

Edit: it is now signed :)

--What Up? 12:56, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 17:55, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Looks good, very nice to have all the links to the videos --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)

Patches

I think this article should be nominated for Featured Article because:

1. It is informative and well-formatted, helping both new and old players access patch and update information.

2. Compared with the TF2 Blog, this page gives a more direct way to access information.

--What Up? 12:56, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support A fun little insight into TF2 history with the patches. I like it. --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)

Über Update

For being a damn fine page and update in itself.  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 17:54, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral It's a little too recent, but I wouldn't complain. --SilverHammer 17:57, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram comment.png Comment Nice, but not terribly exciting. Will consider for future Feature --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support I found the Update GREAT in content and the Build up to the Meet the medic video. And Cructo, I agree with you, It is a fine update. User:RRaccoon99

Cow Mangler 5000

It disintegrates players, even their gibs! It fires lazers, first soldier weapon to directly cause mini-crits. Has the disabling affects of a sapper(without the obvious destruction). Has moar ammo in a clip than any weapon, and the most ammo, being indefinitely usable. Is moderately easy to craft. Ummmm..... Thats about it please nominate this lol.... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bunnydav1d (talk) • (contribs)

Pictogram comment.png Comment Articles should be nominated based on the article itself, not on the weapon. --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)

ÜberCharge

A well written article, referring to the variants, functions, and methods of using an ÜberCharge, including strategies on how to preserve or rapidly obtain an Über, which makes it not only informative, but undeniably useful for new players wanting to play the Medic class. I believe that this article, while smaller than most, is incredibly well done, and deserves to be featured. Apologies for the run on sentence.

Edit: Signed it.Triscuitable 02:09, 13 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral Will agree as soon as a better picture is added to the article. That is literally my only issue with it, but it's a big enough issue for me that I can't agree until then. Nonetheless, it's a well-written article and you bring up many, many good points in that single sentence.--SilverHammer 02:21, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support CHARGE ME! Also SilverHammer the pic was changed recently, is that good for you?  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 12:11, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
It's good enough for me to change my choice to Pictogram plus.png Support, but I'd really rather it was... pretty much an exact remake of the Viaduct art from the Classless Update with Uber skins. You can't see the Medigun or the healbeam or anything. Still, better than it was. --SilverHammer 12:13, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram neutral.png Neutral I'd like a better image as well, showing that the Medic is a big part of the uber process --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 00:01, 16 October 2011 (PDT)

Item timeline

Something of a hub article. It is a complete, interesting, informative article. Heck of a lot of links... pretty much exactly what's on the tin. It's an item timeline. It does what it says it will and looks sexy doing it. --SilverHammer 23:25, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral It's got what it needs to be, but it's a list. We'd be better off showing off the weapons, or the item sets. I'm gray here. Triscuitable 20:34, 19 August 2011 (PDT)

Featured Article on the Team Fortress Classic Main Page

the teamfortress classic main page doesnt have a featured article. why not give it one? scout maybe? The preceding unsigned comment was added by DJLO (talk) • (contribs)

Please don't forget to sign your posts when posting on any discussion pages. As for the featured article, I have no idea what you mean. So no opinion. --SilverHammer 21:15, 18 August 2011 (PDT)

This made no sense, so I'm just going to put my opinion as Pictogram comment.png Brainfart. Good day.
Edit: He wants to feature a Team Fortress Classic article on the Team Fortress Classic Main Page on this wiki, because it's currently a Spanish "Example" featured article. In Spanish. So let's change the title to be less "confusing".Triscuitable 20:43, 19 August 2011 (PDT)
That's Latin. BTW, Pictogram plus.png Support. The Classic pages need a bit more of attention, and that would certainly help.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 19:28, 24 August 2011 (PDT)

Help:Style guide/Trivia

More necessary than any other. --SilverHammer 19:27, 24 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral Important, but not actually relevant to the game itself.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 19:29, 24 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram minus.png Disagree Trivia is good stuff, and knowing what to do to post or edit it is even moreso, but most come here to learn about the game, not the Wiki work they likely don't plan on doing. Triscuitable 19:26, 19 September 2011 (PDT)

Halloween Special 2011 or Horseless Headless Horseman

It's almost that time of year folks!

The very instant this update gets released I think it should go straight to the featured article section and stay there for the next fortnight. Can't wait to bash the crap out of the HHH --Scout Decal Black.png ScoutKast 01:41, 15 September 2011 (PDT)

The former doesn't exist (and if it did, it'd be too small/too recent/in need of a revision), and the latter already has a topic in this page.  –  Epic Eric (T | C) 18:59, 19 September 2011 (PDT)

Baleful Beacon

I acully like the concept of this item, Its basicly Finished so all valve is to do is add it in Tf2.-- RRaccoon99 12:07, 5 November 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram minus.png Disagree It doesn't meet the requirements to be featured.  –  Cructo [T][C] 17:11, 6 November 2011 (PST)

Kill icon

Not much to say, it's a good page and informative.  –  Cructo [T][C] 17:11, 6 November 2011 (PST)