Team Fortress Wiki:Featured articles

From Team Fortress Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Featured articles

Featured articles exemplify some of the best written and most informational articles on Team Fortress Wiki. Featured articles must adhere to the featured article criteria below.

Featured articles are determined and rotated by the staff.

Criteria

  1. A featured article is—
    • informative: it should contain both helpful and useful information;
    • comprehensive: it should be complete, without omission of major facts or details;
    • accurate: it should be factually accurate, and sourced where appropriate.
  2. It should also be—
    • well-written: the prose of the article is engaging, and of a professional standard;
    • properly styled: the article should follow all conventions in the Style guide;
    • stable: the article should not be currently undergoing any major revisions or edit wars;
    • of appropriate length: the article should stay focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail.
  3. Its use of media should be—
    • referential: images should be used as a source of reference;
    • to clarify: images should be used to help illustrate a point;
    • informational: images should be used to display additional information.
    • Media used on a featured article must be appropriately licensed and include source information on the file description page.
  4. A featured article must also be—
    • well-connected:
      • by linking to all relevant articles;
      • by linking to reliable outside sources where appropriate.

Current featured articles

Achieved.png

Nomination procedure

To nominate an article—

  1. Ensure that the article meets the criteria.
  2. Add a new section to the Current nominations section below, and include a link to the article and a statement from you about it.
  3. Add {{Featured article candidate}} to the talk page of the article.

Anyone is free to nominate any article they consider to meet the featured criteria.

Current nominations

Contents

Item quality

It's informative and well written, and it's also relevant. I don't see why not.  – User Ohyeahcrucz Sig.png Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 21:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support A good article to feature in the future --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 14:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Medieval_Mode

I am nominating the Medieval Mode page as it is well written, contains a good amount of informative information, and last but not least, is very funny in my opinion. --Sp3ctr3 23:42, 24 July 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support Good article, very well written and informative. PhantomLimb 18:06, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support A surprisingly well done article. The number of chat replacements is simply priceless --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Very popular game mode so it would be helpful. MaxMan1300 14:11, 6 October 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support I actully Like the Mode. I've gotten over the Made for Demoknights thing. But still. Like the Dreamcast, It was a star. Was great, but lived shortly. --RRaccoon99 09:16, 13 November 2011 (PST)

First Annual Saxxy Awards

I think that this is worthy of being nominated for a Featured Article because:
- It is formatted well.
- It is informative on the categories and who won each of them.
- Gives new users insight into the Team Fortress 2 Community.
- The links are correct.

Edit: it is now signed :)

--What Up? 12:56, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 17:55, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Looks good, very nice to have all the links to the videos --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Pretty nice article. THis one certainly should be featured later.  –  Epic Eric (T | C) 13:40, 16 November 2011 (PST)

Patches

I think this article should be nominated for Featured Article because:

1. It is informative and well-formatted, helping both new and old players access patch and update information.

2. Compared with the TF2 Blog, this page gives a more direct way to access information.

--What Up? 12:56, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram plus.png Support A fun little insight into TF2 history with the patches. I like it. --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support Well, history is built with small patches here and there, and so is TF2. This one is nice.  –  Epic Eric (T | C) 13:40, 16 November 2011 (PST)

Über Update

For being a damn fine page and update in itself.  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 17:54, 8 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral It's a little too recent, but I wouldn't complain. --SilverHammer 17:57, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram comment.png Comment Nice, but not terribly exciting. Will consider for future Feature --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support I found the Update GREAT in content and the Build up to the Meet the medic video. And Cructo, I agree with you, It is a fine update. User:RRaccoon99

Cow Mangler 5000

It disintegrates players, even their gibs! It fires lazers, first soldier weapon to directly cause mini-crits. Has the disabling affects of a sapper(without the obvious destruction). Has moar ammo in a clip than any weapon, and the most ammo, being indefinitely usable. Is moderately easy to craft. Ummmm..... Thats about it please nominate this lol.... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bunnydav1d (talk) • (contribs)

Pictogram comment.png Comment Articles should be nominated based on the article itself, not on the weapon. --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 08:13, 9 August 2011 (PDT)

ÜberCharge

A well written article, referring to the variants, functions, and methods of using an ÜberCharge, including strategies on how to preserve or rapidly obtain an Über, which makes it not only informative, but undeniably useful for new players wanting to play the Medic class. I believe that this article, while smaller than most, is incredibly well done, and deserves to be featured. Apologies for the run on sentence.

Edit: Signed it.Triscuitable 02:09, 13 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral Will agree as soon as a better picture is added to the article. That is literally my only issue with it, but it's a big enough issue for me that I can't agree until then. Nonetheless, it's a well-written article and you bring up many, many good points in that single sentence.--SilverHammer 02:21, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram plus.png Support CHARGE ME! Also SilverHammer the pic was changed recently, is that good for you?  – User Heffebaycay stslogo.png Cructo [T][C] 12:11, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
It's good enough for me to change my choice to Pictogram plus.png Support, but I'd really rather it was... pretty much an exact remake of the Viaduct art from the Classless Update with Uber skins. You can't see the Medigun or the healbeam or anything. Still, better than it was. --SilverHammer 12:13, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
Pictogram neutral.png Neutral I'd like a better image as well, showing that the Medic is a big part of the uber process --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 00:01, 16 October 2011 (PDT)

Item timeline

Something of a hub article. It is a complete, interesting, informative article. Heck of a lot of links... pretty much exactly what's on the tin. It's an item timeline. It does what it says it will and looks sexy doing it. --SilverHammer 23:25, 16 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram neutral.png Neutral It's got what it needs to be, but it's a list. We'd be better off showing off the weapons, or the item sets. I'm gray here. Triscuitable 20:34, 19 August 2011 (PDT)

Featured Article on the Team Fortress Classic Main Page

the teamfortress classic main page doesnt have a featured article. why not give it one? scout maybe? The preceding unsigned comment was added by DJLO (talk) • (contribs)

Please don't forget to sign your posts when posting on any discussion pages. As for the featured article, I have no idea what you mean. So no opinion. --SilverHammer 21:15, 18 August 2011 (PDT)

This made no sense, so I'm just going to put my opinion as Pictogram comment.png Brainfart. Good day.
Edit: He wants to feature a Team Fortress Classic article on the Team Fortress Classic Main Page on this wiki, because it's currently a Spanish "Example" featured article. In Spanish. So let's change the title to be less "confusing".Triscuitable 20:43, 19 August 2011 (PDT)
That's Latin. BTW, Pictogram plus.png Support. The Classic pages need a bit more of attention, and that would certainly help.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 19:28, 24 August 2011 (PDT)

Pictogram comment.png Brainfart Wait, What? - RRaccoon99 18:07, 17 November 2011 (PST)

Kill icon

Not much to say, it's a good page and informative.  –  Cructo [T][C] 17:11, 6 November 2011 (PST)

Non-player characters

Complete and informative, includes several pics and tons of information about the game's backstory. That 50 kilobytes article is one of this Wiki's "masterpieces", and it certainly deserves more attention.  –  Epic Eric (T | C) 11:42, 13 November 2011 (PST)

Pictogram tick.png Yes I like this page. So many characters! --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 12:00, 18 November 2011 (PST)
Personal tools
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Languages
Team Fortress 2
Team Fortress Classic
Valve Wiki Network
Portal Wiki