Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dalokohs Bar"
(→Vintage) |
Fox McCloud (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::::: I still have two Vintage Dalokohs Bars in [http://optf2.com/user/Alex2539 my backpack]. Also, name was never altered. A lot of Unique items have a "proper" prefix. For the Dalokohs Bar, it's "The". When an item is vintage, it ignores the "proper" prefix and uses "Vintage" instead. This means that your old "The Dalokohs Bar" became a "Vintage Dalokohs Bar" after the Mann-Conomy update. If it is called "The Dalokohs Bar" it is not because the name changed, but simply because it is not Vintage. In your case there was either some crazy glitch that removed the "Vintage" status of your item, or you inadvertently lost the Vintage item and had it replaced with a Unique version. I think I found your backpack (is your Steam id the same as your username here?) and I checked your items on OPTF2. The default listing there is by time. The items listed first were found first. It lists ''both'' of your Dalokohs Bars as having been received after the Mann-Conomy update. In this case, it is correct that neither one is vintage. I checked the item history at TF2Items and you did have a Dalokohs bar there prior to the update, so that one would have been Vintage. Is it possible you traded the Vintage one away accidentally? -- [[Image:User Alex2539 Sig.png|link=User:Alex2539|Alex2539]] -- 09:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | :::::: I still have two Vintage Dalokohs Bars in [http://optf2.com/user/Alex2539 my backpack]. Also, name was never altered. A lot of Unique items have a "proper" prefix. For the Dalokohs Bar, it's "The". When an item is vintage, it ignores the "proper" prefix and uses "Vintage" instead. This means that your old "The Dalokohs Bar" became a "Vintage Dalokohs Bar" after the Mann-Conomy update. If it is called "The Dalokohs Bar" it is not because the name changed, but simply because it is not Vintage. In your case there was either some crazy glitch that removed the "Vintage" status of your item, or you inadvertently lost the Vintage item and had it replaced with a Unique version. I think I found your backpack (is your Steam id the same as your username here?) and I checked your items on OPTF2. The default listing there is by time. The items listed first were found first. It lists ''both'' of your Dalokohs Bars as having been received after the Mann-Conomy update. In this case, it is correct that neither one is vintage. I checked the item history at TF2Items and you did have a Dalokohs bar there prior to the update, so that one would have been Vintage. Is it possible you traded the Vintage one away accidentally? -- [[Image:User Alex2539 Sig.png|link=User:Alex2539|Alex2539]] -- 09:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::I've only ever had two as far as I can remember (one crafted, one dropped), so I don't think I've lost it. I've sent a bug report, so I'll wait and see if Valve gets back to me on it. Thanks for the help though, guys. '''''[[User:Siphida|Siphida]]'''''<sup>''[[User talk:Siphida|talk]]''</sup> 10:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | :::::::I've only ever had two as far as I can remember (one crafted, one dropped), so I don't think I've lost it. I've sent a bug report, so I'll wait and see if Valve gets back to me on it. Thanks for the help though, guys. '''''[[User:Siphida|Siphida]]'''''<sup>''[[User talk:Siphida|talk]]''</sup> 10:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Bug?== | ||
| + | Should the fact that a dispenser doesn't heal a heavy back to 350 points of health be considered a bug, or not? I suggest it's a bug, based purely on mechanics; the bar, itself, states that it increases your max health by +50. The Eyelander and delivery man set both state that they do the same, and yet this bug doesn't exist with them; if the bar said that it *overhealed* you by 50 health for 30 seconds, then I'd tend to agree that it is not a bug, but this is clearly not what the weapon description states, nor is it how its handled, in-game.--[[User:Fox McCloud|Fox McCloud]] 20:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 27 December 2010
Cooldown
Can anyone test to see if the Sandvich cool down applies to the Dalokohs bar too? I don't have one right now. --Firestorm 02:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- It does. Shine 02:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Vintage
I noticed that the Dalokohs Bar in my backpack has reverted from being "Vintage" to being "Unique" after they altered the name from "Dalokohs Bar" to "The Dalokohs Bar" in the October 30th patch. Has this happened to anybody else? It may be noteworthy if so. Siphidatalk 07:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not sure what you mean. Can you provide a backpack link? Moussekateer 07:33, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Check Rarity for the difference between Vintage and Unique. I had one vintage bar and one unique bar but after the patch the vintage one reverted to being unique. Here's my backpack. Siphidatalk 08:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just popping in to tell you that my "The Dalokohs Bar" is still vintage. Serg 08:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's odd. I'll send a bug report off to Valve later. Siphidatalk 08:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Same, nothing wrong with mine. Get on that hooter! Moussekateer 08:32, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- I still have two Vintage Dalokohs Bars in my backpack. Also, name was never altered. A lot of Unique items have a "proper" prefix. For the Dalokohs Bar, it's "The". When an item is vintage, it ignores the "proper" prefix and uses "Vintage" instead. This means that your old "The Dalokohs Bar" became a "Vintage Dalokohs Bar" after the Mann-Conomy update. If it is called "The Dalokohs Bar" it is not because the name changed, but simply because it is not Vintage. In your case there was either some crazy glitch that removed the "Vintage" status of your item, or you inadvertently lost the Vintage item and had it replaced with a Unique version. I think I found your backpack (is your Steam id the same as your username here?) and I checked your items on OPTF2. The default listing there is by time. The items listed first were found first. It lists both of your Dalokohs Bars as having been received after the Mann-Conomy update. In this case, it is correct that neither one is vintage. I checked the item history at TF2Items and you did have a Dalokohs bar there prior to the update, so that one would have been Vintage. Is it possible you traded the Vintage one away accidentally? --
-- 09:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- I still have two Vintage Dalokohs Bars in my backpack. Also, name was never altered. A lot of Unique items have a "proper" prefix. For the Dalokohs Bar, it's "The". When an item is vintage, it ignores the "proper" prefix and uses "Vintage" instead. This means that your old "The Dalokohs Bar" became a "Vintage Dalokohs Bar" after the Mann-Conomy update. If it is called "The Dalokohs Bar" it is not because the name changed, but simply because it is not Vintage. In your case there was either some crazy glitch that removed the "Vintage" status of your item, or you inadvertently lost the Vintage item and had it replaced with a Unique version. I think I found your backpack (is your Steam id the same as your username here?) and I checked your items on OPTF2. The default listing there is by time. The items listed first were found first. It lists both of your Dalokohs Bars as having been received after the Mann-Conomy update. In this case, it is correct that neither one is vintage. I checked the item history at TF2Items and you did have a Dalokohs bar there prior to the update, so that one would have been Vintage. Is it possible you traded the Vintage one away accidentally? --
- Same, nothing wrong with mine. Get on that hooter! Moussekateer 08:32, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's odd. I'll send a bug report off to Valve later. Siphidatalk 08:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just popping in to tell you that my "The Dalokohs Bar" is still vintage. Serg 08:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Check Rarity for the difference between Vintage and Unique. I had one vintage bar and one unique bar but after the patch the vintage one reverted to being unique. Here's my backpack. Siphidatalk 08:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Bug?
Should the fact that a dispenser doesn't heal a heavy back to 350 points of health be considered a bug, or not? I suggest it's a bug, based purely on mechanics; the bar, itself, states that it increases your max health by +50. The Eyelander and delivery man set both state that they do the same, and yet this bug doesn't exist with them; if the bar said that it *overhealed* you by 50 health for 30 seconds, then I'd tend to agree that it is not a bug, but this is clearly not what the weapon description states, nor is it how its handled, in-game.--Fox McCloud 20:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
