|
|
| (12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == About this "dropping" == | + | {{Talk archive |
| | + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| | + | | arc1link = Talk:Original/Archive 1 |
| | + | }} |
| | | | |
| − | Is this a for sure thing? Has anyone actually got one? [[User:Jh9594|Jh9594]] 19:15, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| + | == Weapon Demonstration Video Replacement == |
| − | :It is currently unreleased. [[File:User_M-NINJA_Signature.png|link=User:M-NINJA]] 19:15, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::Yes, but someone put that it drops. How can they know this without having got one. [[User:Jh9594|Jh9594]] 19:21, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::It was a mistake, the template defaults to drop if nothing is entered for the availability field. Been fixed now. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 19:22, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | Actually I've already seen a few people with this and the tamrielic relic, so maybe you can get it in a drop <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:SteamingKettleOfIgnorance|SteamingKettleOfIgnorance]]''' ([[User talk:SteamingKettleOfIgnorance|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/SteamingKettleOfIgnorance|contribs]]) 23:37, 3 August 2011</small>
| |
| − | ::I would suspect that if people had it now you'd see people offering it on trading websites such as TF2TP. Though I suppose it's possible that they are untradable and ungiftable.--[[User:Jordan|Jordan]] 21:19, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::Read the post above yours, it was an accident, it does not drop anymore. Making those found very valuable for the time being. [[User:Dr. Blutengott|Dr. Blutengott]] 21:21, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::::{{c|Nope}} Let me stop you right there, all the items have the attribute "cannot trade" attached...for now. So for the time being they would be "worthless" to traders. [[File:User_M-NINJA_Signature.png|link=User:M-NINJA]] 21:27, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | I didnt mean to traders, just to people who got the items. Who would trade one anyway at this time? [[User:Dr. Blutengott|Dr. Blutengott]] 21:30, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | I have this item in non-genuine not tradable quality, obtained from a drop (I do not have Quake 4). It dropped 7/9. Check my backpack under "Blasterfire" on tf2 items. [[User:Blasterfire|Blasterfire]] 16:46, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
| + | So due to this being out of date, it's even noted so should we change the video to an up-to-date one or leave it there? |
| − | :As of today [[August_9,_2011_Patch|August 9th]], the item drops. But when this topic began on [[August_3,_2011_Patch|August 3rd]], the item was not in the drop system. [[File:User_M-NINJA_Signature.png|link=User:M-NINJA]] 16:49, 9 August 2011 (PDT)
| + | [[User:Zarioo12|Zarioo12]] ([[User talk:Zarioo12|talk]]) 16:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | == "The projectiles from the weapon also fire from the center of the screen. " == | + | :There is no up-to-date video, once there is it will replace the current one.<br>[[User:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">GrampaSwood</font>]] ([[User talk:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">talk</font>]]) 17:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | When I tested it out in itemtest it didn't really appear to come from the center. Instead it felt like it shot from the some place any other launcher would shoot it. Is this just a problem on my end?--[[User:Jordan|Jordan]] 20:38, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| + | ::I could redo the video. Should I? |
| − | :Attributes probably haven't been added yet. [[User:Secret Agent Clank|Clank]] 20:44, 3 August 2011 (PDT) | + | ::----[[User:Slimyboi500|Slimyboi500]] ([[User talk:Slimyboi500|talk]]) [[File:User Slimyboi500 Profile.jpg|25px]] 21:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
| − | ::The attributes have been added, I've checked items_game. I just don't think they have implemented the use of it yet. [[User:Zadrave|Zadrave]] 20:46, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::Well no. According to the schema "centerfire projectile" is an actual attribute. The problem is that itemtest items don't completely work properly. For instance, the detonator's flare cannot be detonated. [[File:User_M-NINJA_Signature.png|link=User:M-NINJA]] 20:47, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::Well that was what I meant, bad wording. Guess we'll have to see if those drops happen. No worries. [[User:Secret Agent Clank|Clank]] 20:50, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::::Thank you for the clarification. Does the fact that "centerfire projectile" is an actual attribute mean it more than a rocket launcher reskin?--[[User:Jordan|Jordan]] 21:18, 3 August 2011 (PDT) | |
| − | :::::Update-eeyup. Comes out slightly under the crosshair rather than on it though. Don't suppose that's worth noting? [[User:Secret Agent Clank|Clank]] 07:17, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == That's quite a gallery ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | We don't need the weapon at every single possible angle. The view model and world model of the Quake original would be fine (maybe in the same image), plus the view model in TF2 (with no background) and then whatever promo image Valve might make would be plenty. Right now we have 3 images from Quake, and a view of Soldier holding the weapon and it's just kind of different than how we do other weapons. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 05:23, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | : Just to reiterate, do we really need Deathmatch Classic images? [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 13:00, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :: Yeah, the DMC view model really seems out of place. DMC is just a recreation of Quakeworld, of course they're going to be similar.
| |
| − | :: What I would like to see is a world model from Quake. More of this model is based on that than Quake's extremely undetailed view model. [[User:Dragonsbrethren|Dragonsbrethren]] 15:42, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Function==
| |
| − | | |
| − | So does this function the same way as the [[Rocket Launcher]]? I put up the sentence in the introduction that says it is, but it was removed, despite it clearly functioning exactly like the Rocket Launcher. Is the information on the page just false, or what? [[User:Shane Alvarado|Shane Alvarado]] 10:26, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Forget it, I see now. Still, a very slight difference. [[User:Shane Alvarado|Shane Alvarado]] 10:34, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :: It's a minor difference, but it does change the way you approach certain situations like corners. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 10:37, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Banned==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Simmiliar problems to the homefront promotion this game is banned in germany[[User:Amp32|Amp32]] 00:10, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Yeah that is still a problem, and steam doesn't care to solve it somehow... [[User:TheDoctor|TheDoctor(without a small pic)]] 16:28, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Well it's the same thing that led to promotions being craft able last time (Homefront) so let's cross our fingers.[[User:Amp32|Amp32]] 00:10, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Non-Steam ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I already have Quake 4, but not as a Steam game. Will I still get it, or am I screwed?[[User:Spartan007|Spartan007]] 16:20, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :Nope. For the nex time, ask on [http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/ SUF] [[User:Dio|Dio ★]] ([[User talk:Dio|talk]]) 16:26, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Lol viewmodels ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Probably not worth noting, but... http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/594692996042918806/630EFE4E501BC1B4A446D1BD14116BDF717F8899/ [[User:Secret Agent Clank|Clank]] 07:20, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Crafting ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The page states there are crafting numbers, but there is no recipe, and it says it is "promotional". Can it be crafted using tokens, or is the crafting numbers an oversight? [[User:Rocket Ship BBQ|Rocket Ship BBQ]] 11:10, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :The craft number is there because it has the 'Can be a numbered craft' attribute in the schema for when it does become craftable. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 11:12, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Files found before release - Trivia or not? ==
| |
| − | A line about the weapon's files that were found before release was added to bugs recently. It was then removed and moved to trivia. Do you think it's "trivia worthy", or should the line be removed completely? <span style="font-family: TF2 Build; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">[[File:User_Heffebaycay_stslogo.png|link=Special:Contributions/Dragory]] [[User:Dragory|Dragory]]</span> 23:15, 12 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | : I'm in favor of removal. The Pip-Boy was usable through the same methods, sans the revised HUD. In this case, it's also mentioned in the update news that they had added new items for upcoming promotions. Considering they outright said they were there, noting that they were there doesn't call for trivia as far as I'm concerned. --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 23:20, 12 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::They mentioned it in the update news? Then I vote for removal myself, too. <span style="font-family: TF2 Build; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">[[File:User_Heffebaycay_stslogo.png|link=Special:Contributions/Dragory]] [[User:Dragory|Dragory]]</span> 01:07, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::Yeah, remove this. It's true for every item added to the game prior to announcement and things working differently in itemtest is already mentioned in the itemtest article. [[User:Dragonsbrethren|Dragonsbrethren]] 13:32, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Draw sound trivia==
| |
| − | Regarding the removal of 'the draw sound of the weapon is audible to other players' [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Original&diff=670267&oldid=670261 here], I wish for more opinions on this. As far as I am aware, should you spectate someone who switches active weapons, no sounds are played. However, for the Original, the draw sound is distinctly audible both to nearby players in the game and spectators of the Soldier. This is surely notable, not as first x of y, but as a mere point of interest.--<span style="color:purple">'''''[[User:Focusknock|Focusknock]]'''''</span> 14:03, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | : It's just louder, more noticeable than the rest. --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 14:04, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :: Smashman and I just tested it. He did hear a noise when I drew the Original but not with any other weapon. To further test, he edited tf/sound/weapons so that draw sounds would play a loud beep. Only Original made this beep. Quod erat demonstrandum.--<span style="color:purple">'''''[[User:Focusknock|Focusknock]]'''''</span> 14:36, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::: Regardless, simple observations such as that aren't trivia. Sorry. --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 14:38, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::: I heartily disagree. If not a trivia point, at least a bug. – [[User:Smashman|<font color=#507D2A>Smashman</font>]]<sub> ([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> 14:40, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::::: Contact Valve and ask if it's a bug, then. I don't want to see any speculation on this article, though. It's about as trivia worthy as the Frying Pan making a Frying Pan sound when it hits stuff, or the Katana having a unique drawsound that ''others can hear as well''. --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 14:42, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::::: Ah, I thought the Original was the only weapons to have an audible draw sound to everyone. In that case yes, perhaps it isn't notable if the Zatoichi is the same. --<span style="color:purple">'''''[[User:Focusknock|Focusknock]]'''''</span> 17:06, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Name of item/article ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The name of the item is "The Original", so should this article be called "The Original", instead of "Original"? [[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 18:30, 5 September 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | : We don't put the "the" in front of items when naming the page. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 18:32, 5 September 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Update notes ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | They currently say "Updated The Original so it can be purchased/crafted/traded/found". Should we not put it in better words? 'Found' can be interpreted as 'found lying on te ground in game'.[[User:Doomgiver|Doomgiver]] 01:38, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
| |
21:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
