Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item sets"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(moved to archive)
(Tag: Replaced)
 
(172 intermediate revisions by 74 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Should most of this be split into 5 separate pack pages? ==
+
{{Talk archive
 
+
| arc1name = Archive 1
Item sets seems like a category, and each set (with its unique function and trivia and so forth) seems like it would make a fine short article.
+
| arc1link = Talk:Item sets/Archive 1
 
+
}}
Imagine someone looking in-game.  They see a "Croc-o-style Set" weapon on a friend and go to TF2Wiki to find out about it.  Will they find a page for it, or a bunch of search options including vague suggestions like "item sets" and "polycount pack?"
 
 
 
I suggest [[The Tank Buster]], [[The Special Delivery]], [[The Gas Jockey's Gear]], [[The Croco-o-style Kit]] and [[The Saharan Spy]] become articles.  This page can then be reduced down, kinda like the generic hat or weapon pages. :)
 
 
 
[[User:Zoolooman|Zoolooman]] 18:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
: What we can do, is set up a redirect, such that a search for "Tank Buster" will link them to the specific section of this page. There really isn't enough information for each article to be worth creating --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
== A question ==
 
 
 
Do we really need to put the effects of each weapon along with the pictures? I think it would look better if we just left those out, as it is rather incomplete at the moment. Just my two cents worth, I guess. [[User:Randomscripter|Randomscripter]] 21:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
: My first idea was to give a nice summary but the page really got big... maybe remove the bonus would be nice and placing them in the pages like the comment from [[User:Zoolooman|Zoolooman]]
 
[[User:Chacal|Chacal]] 02:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
== Bonus colors ==
 
 
 
Is there a way to set color bonus like the items (blue for good stuff, red for bad)?
 
: I attempted to however I don't know how to edit the information in the boxes.--[[User:Jordan|Jordan]] 12:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
== Cost to craft all set hats ==
 
 
 
*2 weapons = 1 scrap
 
*3 scrap = 1 reclaimed
 
*3 reclaimed = 1 refined
 
*4 refined + weapon = set hat
 
*16 refined = all 4 set hats
 
*1 refined = 54 weapons
 
*16 refined = 864 weapons
 
Shouldn't this be mentioned?
 
 
 
[[User:Layzergun|Layzergun]] 23:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
: I'm gonna say no, not useful in any way. [[User:Moussekateer|Moussekateer]] 23:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 
: Absolutely not. ~ <code>[[User:Lhavelund|<font color=red><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">'''lhavelund'''</span></font>]]</code> <sup>([[User_talk:lhavelund|talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/lhavelund|contrib]])</sup> 23:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:I would say no. Also, there are '''5''' set hats. [[User:Lemon|Lemon]] 23:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:Oops, forgot the fez. :P
 
*All 5 set hats = 1080 weapons.
 
Now that I think about it, most likely there are going to be more set hats, so that info is pretty much useless... It's like reporting how much metal it would take to craft all the hats/weapons.
 
[[User:Layzergun|Layzergun]] 11:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 01:10, 19 January 2024

Talk archives
Intel blu idle.png Archive 1