Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Style guide/Weapons"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:As a sub-section of trivia, or a new section altogether? I think a sub-section would be more appropriate. --[[User:Underyx|<font color="blue">Underyx</font>]] 10:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:As a sub-section of trivia, or a new section altogether? I think a sub-section would be more appropriate. --[[User:Underyx|<font color="blue">Underyx</font>]] 10:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::I was thinking more of a new section. A sub-section would simply clutter trivia up more, but I can see the merits of it.--[[User:Focusknock|Focusknock]] 10:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::I was thinking more of a new section. A sub-section would simply clutter trivia up more, but I can see the merits of it.--[[User:Focusknock|Focusknock]] 10:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::Screenshots as [http://goo.gl/6JCT new section] and as [http://goo.gl/Kq1W sub-section]. The latter one seems nicer to me. --[[User:Underyx|<font color="blue">Underyx</font>]] 10:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:{{c|Approve}} Ya. {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub>&nbsp;([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 10:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:{{c|Approve}} Ya. {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub>&nbsp;([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 10:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:{{c|support|Tentative Support:}} It's always been my opinion that bugs really don't have a place in the Trivia sections, but usually if it's just one bug of notable interest I would leave it in. Some weapons though seem to just have bug after bug listed. I have already created a new section for [[Your Eternal Reward#Bugs|Your Eternal Reward]] because there were so many and it didn't seem right to remove so much information just because it wasn't technically trivia. In this case it certainly deserved its own section. Actually, now that I think about it, "Previous Changes" might better fit as a subsection of the Bugs section. Anyway, if it'll help clean up the page, then I'm for it. Such a section would require more maintenance though, since new bugs would need to actually be verified. -- [[Image:User Alex2539 Sig.png|link=User:Alex2539|Alex2539]] -- 10:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:{{c|support|Tentative Support:}} It's always been my opinion that bugs really don't have a place in the Trivia sections, but usually if it's just one bug of notable interest I would leave it in. Some weapons though seem to just have bug after bug listed. I have already created a new section for [[Your Eternal Reward#Bugs|Your Eternal Reward]] because there were so many and it didn't seem right to remove so much information just because it wasn't technically trivia. In this case it certainly deserved its own section. Actually, now that I think about it, "Previous Changes" might better fit as a subsection of the Bugs section. Anyway, if it'll help clean up the page, then I'm for it. Such a section would require more maintenance though, since new bugs would need to actually be verified. -- [[Image:User Alex2539 Sig.png|link=User:Alex2539|Alex2539]] -- 10:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:18, 24 October 2010

Crafting Ingredient Blueprints

Recently I have seen many edits to the weapon pages, where blueprints have been added regarding the weapon's use as a crafting ingredient. Please discuss whether such blueprints should be added to the guidelines and embraced, or whether they should be removed altogether.--Focusknock 11:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram comment.png Information: For example: Razorback#As_a_Crafting_Ingredient
Pictogram cross.png Remove: While I see the reason for how to craft the weapon itself, how often do you ask yourself: Oh, what could I make out of that? --CruelCow 11:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram comment.png Comment Well if I had a spare weapon and I was missing a few other weapons I might be interested to know what I could make. I think it's a pretty good idea.  – Smashman (talk) 11:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram tick.png Why not?: It's not as if they're harmful to the wiki or anything.{{subst:void|This template should always be substituted. Please change {{Unsigned}} to {{subst:Unsigned}}}}The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Neotank (talk) • (contribs) 16:46, 17 October 2010
Pictogram tick.png Sure: It can be useful for pepole who don't know what they can do with their spare weapons. --Parseus lm(pl) 19:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram comment.png Comment If they're kept on the wiki, the template needs a serious update. It's an eyesore right now. ~ lhavelund (talkcontrib) 02:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Bug section

Currently the trivia section is host to a number of statements concerning cosmetic and gameplay bugs concerning the weapon. I propose the addition of a Bugs section in order to seperate these from the trivia section but keep them relevant to readers.--Focusknock 10:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

As a sub-section of trivia, or a new section altogether? I think a sub-section would be more appropriate. --Underyx 10:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I was thinking more of a new section. A sub-section would simply clutter trivia up more, but I can see the merits of it.--Focusknock 10:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Screenshots as new section and as sub-section. The latter one seems nicer to me. --Underyx 10:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Approve Ya.  – Smashman (talk) 10:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Tentative Support: It's always been my opinion that bugs really don't have a place in the Trivia sections, but usually if it's just one bug of notable interest I would leave it in. Some weapons though seem to just have bug after bug listed. I have already created a new section for Your Eternal Reward because there were so many and it didn't seem right to remove so much information just because it wasn't technically trivia. In this case it certainly deserved its own section. Actually, now that I think about it, "Previous Changes" might better fit as a subsection of the Bugs section. Anyway, if it'll help clean up the page, then I'm for it. Such a section would require more maintenance though, since new bugs would need to actually be verified. -- Alex2539 -- 10:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)