Difference between revisions of "Talk:Buffalo Steak Sandvich"
Cheezcracker (talk | contribs) |
GrampaSwood (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The fact it doesn't stack with crits or mini-crits may be intentional. This is due to the fact it used to mark you for death, and changing it to a vuln. was a buff, but if it did stack with mini-crits then the situations where someone has guaranteed mini-crits (example being the buff banner) then you would end up taking MORE damage than the previous version, making it not a direct buff. [[User:Cheezcracker|Cheezcracker]] ([[User talk:Cheezcracker|talk]]) 20:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | The fact it doesn't stack with crits or mini-crits may be intentional. This is due to the fact it used to mark you for death, and changing it to a vuln. was a buff, but if it did stack with mini-crits then the situations where someone has guaranteed mini-crits (example being the buff banner) then you would end up taking MORE damage than the previous version, making it not a direct buff. [[User:Cheezcracker|Cheezcracker]] ([[User talk:Cheezcracker|talk]]) 20:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Having damage vulnerability increase the damage of (Mini-)Crits is expected behaviour. I can't find anything in the code about exceptions either, if you find anything about it then I think we can reasonably call it intentional.<br>[[File:BLU Wiki Cap.png|20px|link=List of Wiki Cap owners]] {{!}} [[Help:Group rights|<span style="color:green;font-family:TF2 Build;">s</span>]] {{!}} [[User:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">GrampaSwood</font>]] [[File:PraisetheSun.png|20px|alt=Praise the Sun!]] ([[User talk:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">talk</font>]]) ([[Special:Contributions/GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">contribs</font>]]) 20:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:37, 19 February 2024
| Talk archives | |
|
Archive 1 |
Damage vuln. bug
The fact it doesn't stack with crits or mini-crits may be intentional. This is due to the fact it used to mark you for death, and changing it to a vuln. was a buff, but if it did stack with mini-crits then the situations where someone has guaranteed mini-crits (example being the buff banner) then you would end up taking MORE damage than the previous version, making it not a direct buff. Cheezcracker (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Having damage vulnerability increase the damage of (Mini-)Crits is expected behaviour. I can't find anything in the code about exceptions either, if you find anything about it then I think we can reasonably call it intentional.
| s | GrampaSwood 
(talk) (contribs) 20:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
