Difference between revisions of "Team Fortress Wiki talk:Draft/Draft space"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
:: If I understand the proposal correctly, since we are unlikely to get a Draft: space, this was a way to set up a substitute.
 
:: If I understand the proposal correctly, since we are unlikely to get a Draft: space, this was a way to set up a substitute.
::  [[User:Mikado282|<span style="font-family: Impact"><font color="db9c1f">''' M I K A D O 282 '''</font></span><span style="font-family: Arial "><font color="00ff00"> <small>⊙</small>⊙⊙⊙⊙<small>⊙ ⊙⊙  ⊙⊙</small></font></span>]] </small> <!-- --
 
--> <small> ([[User:Mikado282/Contact Mikado282|Contact Mikado282 (SM)]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/Mikado282|'''''contribs''''']]) ([[User:Mikado282/Help Wanted!|'''''Help Wanted!''''']]) </small> 02:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 
 
:: None of what you say about the idea of policy building (and such) in single-user space is unture, yet, long experience with the sandbox approach is that it in fact inhibits ''open'' collaboration, open invatitions making no matter.
 
:: None of what you say about the idea of policy building (and such) in single-user space is unture, yet, long experience with the sandbox approach is that it in fact inhibits ''open'' collaboration, open invatitions making no matter.
 
:: The proposer's intention is that the Draft subfolder "sandbox" would have none of the collaboration constriants of a user sandbox, especially with the updated expressed injunctions against just anyone editing anyone else's sandbox without a by-your-leave.
 
:: The proposer's intention is that the Draft subfolder "sandbox" would have none of the collaboration constriants of a user sandbox, especially with the updated expressed injunctions against just anyone editing anyone else's sandbox without a by-your-leave.
::[[User:Mikado282|<span style="font-family: Impact"><font color="db9c1f">''' M I K A D O 282 '''</font></span><span style="font-family: Arial "><font color="00ff00"> <small>⊙</small>⊙⊙⊙⊙<small>⊙ ⊙⊙  ⊙⊙</small></font></span>]] </small> <!-- --  
+
:: Much of what you say about user sandbox, WP now says about Draft: -- but in practice, the drafts are still mostly single users, AFAIK, and the most common experience is "I think your work should be deleted, but I'll draftify it now so it can be auto-deleted in 6 months."
--> <small> ([[User:Mikado282/Contact Mikado282|Contact Mikado282 (SM)]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/Mikado282|'''''contribs''''']]) ([[User:Mikado282/Help Wanted!|'''''Help Wanted!''''']]) </small> 02:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
+
:: [[User:Mikado282|<span style="font-family: Impact"><font color="db9c1f">''' M I K A D O 282 '''</font></span><span style="font-family: Arial "><font color="00ff00"> <small>⊙</small>⊙⊙⊙⊙<small>⊙ ⊙⊙  ⊙⊙</small></font></span>]] </small> <!-- --  
 +
--> <small> ([[User:Mikado282/Contact Mikado282|Contact Mikado282 (SM)]]) | ([[Special:Contributions/Mikado282|'''''contribs''''']]) ([[User:Mikado282/Help Wanted!|'''''Help Wanted!''''']]) </small> 02:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:50, 8 June 2023

Draft space

The idea was suggested to me by an Administrator that I won't throw under the bus.

I think the proposal is to treat the space under Team Fortress Wiki:Draft/ as draft space.

I have some experience with Wikipedia draftification.

We would need some policy. I don't favor the 6 month auto-delete, and the attendant backdoor deletion through draftificaiton.

I really wanted to visualise this (BOLDLY without explicit permission). Delete it if you need to, after discussion is started, please. My understanding is the intention to make the Draft area open to collaboration (more so than user space)?

M I K A D O 282 ⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ (Contact Mikado282 (SM)) | (contribs) (Help Wanted!) 03:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC) 03:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I fail to see the purpose of having a draft space in the main namespace, staff and non-staff users already uses sandboxes in order to build articles, policies, or for leisure. Usually if a new policy/article gets proposed, it is encouraged for it to be built in a sandbox first, then after being reviewed, the article in question gets moved to the main namespace.
Perhaps I'm not looking it at a right angle, and I can be enlighten.
YossefTalk 05:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
If I understand the proposal correctly, since we are unlikely to get a Draft: space, this was a way to set up a substitute.
None of what you say about the idea of policy building (and such) in single-user space is unture, yet, long experience with the sandbox approach is that it in fact inhibits open collaboration, open invatitions making no matter.
The proposer's intention is that the Draft subfolder "sandbox" would have none of the collaboration constriants of a user sandbox, especially with the updated expressed injunctions against just anyone editing anyone else's sandbox without a by-your-leave.
Much of what you say about user sandbox, WP now says about Draft: -- but in practice, the drafts are still mostly single users, AFAIK, and the most common experience is "I think your work should be deleted, but I'll draftify it now so it can be auto-deleted in 6 months."
M I K A D O 282 ⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ (Contact Mikado282 (SM)) | (contribs) (Help Wanted!) 02:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)