Difference between revisions of "User talk:Balladofwindfishes"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Trivia, ect.)
(Trivia, ect.)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
::: How so? Elements of how a weapon works are not trivia (see Frontier Justice edit you reverted). The Bonk thing is mindless trivia. Lots of effects end if you hit the resupply -- [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 02:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::: How so? Elements of how a weapon works are not trivia (see Frontier Justice edit you reverted). The Bonk thing is mindless trivia. Lots of effects end if you hit the resupply -- [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 02:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::::If I may interject, I agree with most of the removals you made from the trivia sections but a lot of the times you tried to add it to the article, you just appended the trivia to the end of one of the paragraphs. I'm looking at your edits to the [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Bonk!_Atomic_Punch&diff=prev&oldid=151988 Bonk] and [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Shortstop&diff=prev&oldid=151985 Shortstop] pages in particular. Doing it like that is a little sloppy and it would be nicer if you thought about how to work it in so that the flow of the paragraph is preserved. If an item seems very difficult to add to the main article but it still seems relevant, then maybe the Trivia section was the best place for it after all, or maybe it should be deleted outright. You're not necessarily doing anything wrong, but slow down a bit and put a little bit more consideration into your work. I guarantee it will come out better. -- [[Image:User Alex2539 Sig.png|link=User:Alex2539|Alex2539]] -- 02:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::::If I may interject, I agree with most of the removals you made from the trivia sections but a lot of the times you tried to add it to the article, you just appended the trivia to the end of one of the paragraphs. I'm looking at your edits to the [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Bonk!_Atomic_Punch&diff=prev&oldid=151988 Bonk] and [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Shortstop&diff=prev&oldid=151985 Shortstop] pages in particular. Doing it like that is a little sloppy and it would be nicer if you thought about how to work it in so that the flow of the paragraph is preserved. If an item seems very difficult to add to the main article but it still seems relevant, then maybe the Trivia section was the best place for it after all, or maybe it should be deleted outright. You're not necessarily doing anything wrong, but slow down a bit and put a little bit more consideration into your work. I guarantee it will come out better. -- [[Image:User Alex2539 Sig.png|link=User:Alex2539|Alex2539]] -- 02:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
:::Maybe today I'll see if I can fix up the Shortstop article. Also, may I ask Mechlord, why did you revert the trivia about how the Scout and Engineer hold their pistol differently. Umm, isn't that obvious considering there isn't a single weapon in the game 2 characters hold the same? I noticed the Frying Pan article did not have that the Soldier and Demo hold it differently, yet you argue I'm not consistent in my edit to the Pistol. Some of your revisions seemed to be nothing more than trying going through and undoing everything I did because one or two of my revisions may have been a little hasty. -- [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
+
:::Maybe today I'll see if I can fix up the Bonk article, since that article has a lot of useless stuff in it's trivia section. Also, may I ask Mechlord, why did you revert the trivia about how the Scout and Engineer hold their pistol differently. Umm, isn't that obvious considering there isn't a single weapon in the game 2 characters hold the same? I noticed the Frying Pan article did not have that the Soldier and Demo hold it differently, yet you argue I'm not consistent in my edit to the Pistol. Some of your revisions seemed to be nothing more than trying going through and undoing everything I did because one or two of my revisions may have been a little hasty. -- [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  
 
==Leave the stock==
 
==Leave the stock==
 
It is relevant trivia and will no doubt be moved to the upcoming bug section we are attempting to implement. On a side note, you cannot simply remove trivia because it is 'not very interesting' to ''you''. --<span style="color:purple">'''''Focusknock'''''</span>  [[Help:Group rights#Content Moderators|<span class="modbg">m</span>]] 09:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 
It is relevant trivia and will no doubt be moved to the upcoming bug section we are attempting to implement. On a side note, you cannot simply remove trivia because it is 'not very interesting' to ''you''. --<span style="color:purple">'''''Focusknock'''''</span>  [[Help:Group rights#Content Moderators|<span class="modbg">m</span>]] 09:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:Oh good, you're making a bug section. I was just going to write up a suggestion to do that
 
:Oh good, you're making a bug section. I was just going to write up a suggestion to do that

Revision as of 12:51, 31 October 2010

Trivia, ect.

Attempt to use the existing format in your alterations. --Mechlord 01:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Which is? I'm just moving things to places they belong and removing things that don't make sense. Gameplay tips are not trivia, nor is mentioning the Scout and Engy hold their pistol differently
Now they're getting utterly inconsistent. Slow down a bit. --Mechlord 01:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
How so? Elements of how a weapon works are not trivia (see Frontier Justice edit you reverted). The Bonk thing is mindless trivia. Lots of effects end if you hit the resupply -- Balladofwindfishes 02:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
If I may interject, I agree with most of the removals you made from the trivia sections but a lot of the times you tried to add it to the article, you just appended the trivia to the end of one of the paragraphs. I'm looking at your edits to the Bonk and Shortstop pages in particular. Doing it like that is a little sloppy and it would be nicer if you thought about how to work it in so that the flow of the paragraph is preserved. If an item seems very difficult to add to the main article but it still seems relevant, then maybe the Trivia section was the best place for it after all, or maybe it should be deleted outright. You're not necessarily doing anything wrong, but slow down a bit and put a little bit more consideration into your work. I guarantee it will come out better. -- Alex2539 -- 02:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Maybe today I'll see if I can fix up the Bonk article, since that article has a lot of useless stuff in it's trivia section. Also, may I ask Mechlord, why did you revert the trivia about how the Scout and Engineer hold their pistol differently. Umm, isn't that obvious considering there isn't a single weapon in the game 2 characters hold the same? I noticed the Frying Pan article did not have that the Soldier and Demo hold it differently, yet you argue I'm not consistent in my edit to the Pistol. Some of your revisions seemed to be nothing more than trying going through and undoing everything I did because one or two of my revisions may have been a little hasty. -- Balladofwindfishes 12:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Leave the stock

It is relevant trivia and will no doubt be moved to the upcoming bug section we are attempting to implement. On a side note, you cannot simply remove trivia because it is 'not very interesting' to you. --Focusknock m 09:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh good, you're making a bug section. I was just going to write up a suggestion to do that