Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item sets"
(→Cost to craft all set hats) |
(→Cost to craft all set hats) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
: I'm gonna say no, not useful in any way. [[User:Moussekateer|Moussekateer]] 23:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | : I'm gonna say no, not useful in any way. [[User:Moussekateer|Moussekateer]] 23:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Absolutely not. ~ <code>[[User:Lhavelund|<font color=red><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">'''lhavelund'''</span></font>]]</code> <sup>([[User_talk:lhavelund|talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/lhavelund|contrib]])</sup> 23:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | : Absolutely not. ~ <code>[[User:Lhavelund|<font color=red><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">'''lhavelund'''</span></font>]]</code> <sup>([[User_talk:lhavelund|talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/lhavelund|contrib]])</sup> 23:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I would say no. Also, there are '''5''' set hats. [[User:Lemon|Lemon]] 23:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 7 November 2010
Contents
Should most of this be split into 5 separate pack pages?
Item sets seems like a category, and each set (with its unique function and trivia and so forth) seems like it would make a fine short article.
Imagine someone looking in-game. They see a "Croc-o-style Set" weapon on a friend and go to TF2Wiki to find out about it. Will they find a page for it, or a bunch of search options including vague suggestions like "item sets" and "polycount pack?"
I suggest The Tank Buster, The Special Delivery, The Gas Jockey's Gear, The Croco-o-style Kit and The Saharan Spy become articles. This page can then be reduced down, kinda like the generic hat or weapon pages. :)
Zoolooman 18:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- What we can do, is set up a redirect, such that a search for "Tank Buster" will link them to the specific section of this page. There really isn't enough information for each article to be worth creating --Firestorm 18:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
A question
Do we really need to put the effects of each weapon along with the pictures? I think it would look better if we just left those out, as it is rather incomplete at the moment. Just my two cents worth, I guess. Randomscripter 21:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- My first idea was to give a nice summary but the page really got big... maybe remove the bonus would be nice and placing them in the pages like the comment from Zoolooman
Chacal 02:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Bonus colors
Is there a way to set color bonus like the items (blue for good stuff, red for bad)?
- I attempted to however I don't know how to edit the information in the boxes.--Jordan 12:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Cost to craft all set hats
- 2 weapons = 1 scrap
- 3 scrap = 1 reclaimed
- 3 reclaimed = 1 refined
- 4 refined + weapon = set hat
- 16 refined = all 4 set hats
- 1 refined = 54 weapons
- 16 refined = 864 weapons
Shouldn't this be mentioned?
Layzergun 23:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm gonna say no, not useful in any way. Moussekateer 23:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. ~
lhavelund(talk ▪ contrib) 23:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC) - I would say no. Also, there are 5 set hats. Lemon 23:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
