Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Map infobox"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Include capture timings for cp maps: new section)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Can someone who knows what they're doing make it so it automatically categorizes maps by gametype? Add <nowiki>[[Category:{{{gametype}}} maps]]</nowiki> or whatever to it. -- [[User:Nineaxis|<span style="color:#FF8C00;font-weight:bold">Nineaxis</span>]] {{mod}} [[File:User Nineaxis sig duck.png|12px]] 00:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 
Can someone who knows what they're doing make it so it automatically categorizes maps by gametype? Add <nowiki>[[Category:{{{gametype}}} maps]]</nowiki> or whatever to it. -- [[User:Nineaxis|<span style="color:#FF8C00;font-weight:bold">Nineaxis</span>]] {{mod}} [[File:User Nineaxis sig duck.png|12px]] 00:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 
:Done. -[[User:Shine|<font color="#666666">'''Shine'''</font>]]&nbsp;({{mod}}) 01:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 
:Done. -[[User:Shine|<font color="#666666">'''Shine'''</font>]]&nbsp;({{mod}}) 01:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Include capture timings for cp maps ==
 +
 +
I find it quite distubing when I see [[Egypt#Control_Point_Timing|tables like the one on the Egypt article]], which looks incredibly poorly formatted, and it seems like informtion which might as well go in the infobox (collapsed). What do others think about this? ~ <code>[[User:Lhavelund|<font color=red><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">'''lhavelund'''</span></font>]]</code> <sup>([[User_talk:lhavelund|t]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/lhavelund|c]])</sup> 03:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:42, 16 October 2010

Categorize by gametype

Can someone who knows what they're doing make it so it automatically categorizes maps by gametype? Add [[Category:{{{gametype}}} maps]] or whatever to it. -- Nineaxis Duck Gib.png 00:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Done. -Shine () 01:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Include capture timings for cp maps

I find it quite distubing when I see tables like the one on the Egypt article, which looks incredibly poorly formatted, and it seems like informtion which might as well go in the infobox (collapsed). What do others think about this? ~ lhavelund (tc) 03:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)