Talk:Team Fortress 2 Beta

From Team Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 01:00, 3 December 2010 by Nineaxis (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Open Beta to Talk:Team Fortress 2 Beta: actual name!)
Jump to: navigation, search

Delete this page

This is unreleased content, it can't have it's own page. {{subst:void|This template should always be substituted. Please change {{Unsigned}} to {{subst:Unsigned}}}}The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheScoot (talk) • (contribs) 2024-05-21, 16:55 UTC

Please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~ --Picard lm(de) 14:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Citations

Well, it was not KritzKast first. First was PC Gamer's interview. Holek 20:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

AHA! I knew I'd heard it somewhere else first.--Focusknock 20:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
But they didn't mention it was open. — Wind 20:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Yes, they did:
PC Gamer: Are there any class updates that you’ve done that you feel you need to revisit?
Robin Walker: (...) There are systems in the game that are tuned to specific numbers. The amount of damage the sniper rifle does fully charged, for instance. On a headshot it’s specifically tuned to the health of the other class, so there would be damage numbers we’d need to change. It’s hard for us to run that test and get good data, so, we’re probably going to gear up the TF2 public beta again soon and make it publicly available to everyone who owns TF. We’ll start running some more wide scale experiments there.
Holek 20:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
/me fails D: — Wind 20:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

hey its ep 82 not 88 {{subst:void|This template should always be substituted. Please change {{Unsigned}} to {{subst:Unsigned}}}}The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madsser (talk) • (contribs) 2024-05-21, 16:55 UTC

Any reason the link to KK keeps getting deleted? If it's a case of not being able to qualify our source, well that's something we're not prepared to do. We promised annominity to He/She/It. But we will be proven correct on it Agro 22:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

As far as I heard on the Podcast, it was just "very soon". We can't really put something here that isn't verifiable, so "soon" will have to suffice until any further announcement about a launch date. Not saying you're wrong, and not trying to be difficult, just that if it's not verifiable, it can't really pass as wiki content. -- Nineaxis Duck Gib.png 22:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
You can leave the KritzKast link there, but the episode didn't disclose a launch date. -- Nineaxis Duck Gib.png 22:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
That's very kind of you, but yes, there was a mention of time scale towards the back of the episode, time stamp 38:15, "It's going to happen this week, basically, by the sounds of things"Agro 22:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Soon. Well, I suppose that the Open Beta's release date is farther than October 18, 2010, according to Valve Time. AbeX300 03:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Trivia

Wouldn't the fact that Counter-Strike Source has an open beta be good trivia for the section? It shows that the TF2 beta wasn't first, and that Valve has done an open beta before. --Stevoisiak 20:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't think we need to note whether it's the first, second, third or fourth open beta. For the same reason we don't document that some hat is the 20th hat added to the game.-RJ 20:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
It's more the fact that alot of people may think the Beta is a new idea that hasn't been done by valve before, even though there is another ongoing beta. --Stevoisiak 20:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

It's uninteresting.  – Smashman (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

It's not relevant to the article. So, no. -- En Ex (talk) 21:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)