Difference between revisions of "Talk:Demoman"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(No taunts as a con ?)
(No taunts as a con ?)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
::I agree, I don't see the lack of a taunt kill as a con. Rather, it's a pro on weapons that do have it. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 19:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 
::I agree, I don't see the lack of a taunt kill as a con. Rather, it's a pro on weapons that do have it. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 19:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
  
i really think its better to remove it / change it into {{pro}} or {{infp}} , because it might confuse people like me D: --&ndash; [[User:Gin_Ginster|<font color=#A57545>'''''Gin_Ginster'''''</font>]]<sub>&nbsp;([[User_talk:Gin_Ginster|talk]])</sub> 19:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
+
i really think its better to remove it / change it into {{pro}} or {{info}} , because it might confuse people like me D: --&ndash; [[User:Gin_Ginster|<font color=#A57545>'''''Gin_Ginster'''''</font>]]<sub>&nbsp;([[User_talk:Gin_Ginster|talk]])</sub> 19:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 10 March 2011

Where was the description found? I only find the trading card which is not quite the same. E rac 02:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

All Meet The Team videos have a character bio featured along with them. Vi3trice 02:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
http://tf2.com/demoman.htm is the direct link for the Demoman's bio. --Woof 02:14, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Class Badge

So uh, which one do we stick with? The Bomb one is on the Meet the Demoman page, but the Demo that's on the page doesn't even have a class emblem on him to begin with :/

I got a RED and BLU version of the one that's on the in-game Demoman. -- Vi3trice (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice Vi3trice, they'd should be included in the trivia section like the beta Soldier's.--Kid Of The Century 13:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Yep, nice one Vi3. Stick them on the page, in the bio and move the ones currently there into the trvia. -- Smashman... (ts) 13:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Sticky Launcher is the Primary weapon

Look at his loadout section.. The Unbeholden 09:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Well the sticky launcher is secondary, but for crafting purposes its primary. same with the revolver, its primary, but for crafting purposes its secondary M-NINJA 23:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
And why Valve does that strange things? when they release a new grenade launcher (if they do that) it will be a chaos. --Jagoba RL 17:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
See the discussion here please :) MK 21:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Demoman has a new emblem

jpwto2.jpg

Where would the emblem be stored (like the other ones on here)?

Spotted this change as well. Curious why Valve did this. In any case, I don't seem to understand your question. Could you rephrase it? --Vaught 00:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Where would the emblem be placed on the article. The answer to that would probably be the Bio. MasterOfTheXP 02:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

The watermark (in the upper left) will also have to be replaced. I have no clue how to go about doing that, though, nor do I know who made and/or posted the previous ones on the other class pages. Boomsta 03:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Could the creator of the stickybomb emblem watermark pass me the picture of the stickybomb? It would be really useful for me and I don't feel like ripping it off the background. Uzikus 17:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
This is a little saddening for valve to change this. Then again his primary weapon is controversial. M-NINJA 22:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Still requesting the new emblem in teamcoloured form. Uzikus 13:12, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Related Merchandise

Should this section really exist in this article? The merchandise is related to the Demoman, but it smacks of advertising and isn't encyclopedic. ButteredToast 16:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Where did you find the card textures?

Hello. I am trying to find the textures for the cards in PNATI, and I was wondering where you found the images for the cards shown in this, the Scout, and the Heavy articles. Hi. 21:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

The Valve Store. - Yack RED Le Party Phantom.png 03:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

That Demo's a Bloodeh Spy!

"Unlike all the other classes who scowl when attacking, the Demoman smiles evilly when attacking."

It's true, not too obvious, and not really known about much. Maybe add it to the Trivia? Lancer anti-tank Rocket 18:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

No taunts as a con ?

I thought that the list only mentions the drawbacks of the weapones from in-game , for example : I don't see that "No taunt" as a Pictogram minus.png  , and the in-game Loudout for any weapones doesn't show up a red text like saying that there is no taunts , from my point of view i think its pointless , its not even an actual bug to mention . --– Gin_Ginster (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

The taunt attack is somewhat useful as a insta-kill for snipers and distracted heavies, otherwise it would be 2-6 hits, possibly allowing them to get away.Eligitine 18:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree, I don't see the lack of a taunt kill as a con. Rather, it's a pro on weapons that do have it. User Moussekateer signature sprite.pngMoussekateer·talk 19:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

i really think its better to remove it / change it into Pictogram plus.png  or Pictogram info.png  , because it might confuse people like me D: --– Gin_Ginster (talk) 19:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)