Difference between revisions of "Talk:Portal"
BrazilianNut (talk | contribs) (→Delete) |
m |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::::::{{Pro}} '''Support.''' - [[User:BrazilianNut|BrazilianNut]] ([[User talk:BrazilianNut|talk]]) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC) | :::::::{{Pro}} '''Support.''' - [[User:BrazilianNut|BrazilianNut]] ([[User talk:BrazilianNut|talk]]) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Outdent}} My understanding was these existed only as consistent link points for games mentioned on the wiki. AFAICT, these games are not mentioned in the main space, curiously enough. [[User:Mikado282|<span style="font-family: Arial"><font color="db9c1f">''' M I K A D O 282 '''</font></span><span style="font-family: Arial "><font color="00ff00"> <small>⊙</small>⊙⊙⊙⊙<small>⊙ ⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ </font></span>]] </small><!-- | ||
+ | --> ([[User:Mikado282/Contact Mikado282|'''''contact''''']])([[User:Mikado282/Help Wanted!|'''''Help Wanted!''''']]) 02:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:31, 14 September 2024
Delete
We only document other games if they are directly relevant to Team Fortress or have promotional items. This page, along with the ones for Left 4 Dead and Counter-Strike, offer no value to this wiki. I'd suggest either reverting the "split" or just redirecting/deleting them. — Tark 20:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I can see the reasoning behind it, and if we do decide to keep it as-is we would have to feature other games from Valve as well. I think to avoid that, simply merging the pages into a series page rather than their own pages (see Half-Life) is what I prefer.
| s | GrampaSwood (talk) (contribs) 20:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Half-Life being a page about the game series and having a "buy now" link for the first game is a bad example imo. It should either be a page about the first Half-Life game or a page about the series (which should list all games in the Half-Life series and moved/renamed to "Half-Life series").
- I understand the rationale of having a page for game series, but they are simply not relevant. We would never consider documenting all the Witcher games just because of the promo item from The Witcher 2. And I see no point in making an exemption for Valve games either (we could definitely make a list of Valve somewhere but that's a talk for another day :^)).
- Game pages are mostly used as "hubs" for the promo items. Making a page for Portal 2 has value: it links to all Portal 2-themed items, has a basic description of the game and some relevant links. In contrast, a page for Portal 1 could be reduced to a brief text passage within the Portal 2 article. — Tark 21:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- imo it would either be for the entire series (the articles have existed for quite a while now, I don't see much reason to not keep them for legacy reasons) or the irrelevant games would be deleted entirely. I prefer the merge, but would support the deletion otherwise.
| s | GrampaSwood (talk) (contribs) 21:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- imo it would either be for the entire series (the articles have existed for quite a while now, I don't see much reason to not keep them for legacy reasons) or the irrelevant games would be deleted entirely. I prefer the merge, but would support the deletion otherwise.
- Support. - BrazilianNut (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
My understanding was these existed only as consistent link points for games mentioned on the wiki. AFAICT, these games are not mentioned in the main space, curiously enough. M I K A D O 282 ⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ ⊙⊙ (contact)(Help Wanted!) 02:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)