Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fire"
(→Marked for Deletion?: new section) |
(reply) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I've never actually managed to hit 2 or more players with [[Armageddon]] taunt, but, if I understand correctly, it does fire damage and can ignite players. If it's true, shouldn't it be added here? <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:ShooterAndy|ShooterAndy]]''' ([[User talk:ShooterAndy|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/ShooterAndy|contribs]]) </small> | I've never actually managed to hit 2 or more players with [[Armageddon]] taunt, but, if I understand correctly, it does fire damage and can ignite players. If it's true, shouldn't it be added here? <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:ShooterAndy|ShooterAndy]]''' ([[User talk:ShooterAndy|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/ShooterAndy|contribs]]) </small> | ||
:Yes. Armageddon's kill icon is already in the gallery, too. -[[User:FlaminSarge|FlaminSarge]] 11:41, 3 August 2012 (PDT) | :Yes. Armageddon's kill icon is already in the gallery, too. -[[User:FlaminSarge|FlaminSarge]] 11:41, 3 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
== Unused Animations == | == Unused Animations == | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
There's a random marked for deletion notice in the middle of the article's intro. It says to see the discussion page, but I'm not seeing anything here about that. Any idea what it's about? [[User:Cosentino|Cosentino]] ([[User talk:Cosentino|talk]]) 00:39, 2 May 2017 (PDT) | There's a random marked for deletion notice in the middle of the article's intro. It says to see the discussion page, but I'm not seeing anything here about that. Any idea what it's about? [[User:Cosentino|Cosentino]] ([[User talk:Cosentino|talk]]) 00:39, 2 May 2017 (PDT) | ||
+ | :Thanks for catching that. Someone improperly put that on the template for the console commands text. It is now fixed. [[Image:User Twolfe Signature.png|25px]] || [[User:Twolfe|twolfe's page]] || [[User talk:Twolfe|twolfe's talk page]] 05:20, 2 May 2017 (PDT) |
Revision as of 12:20, 2 May 2017
Contents
Table of Weapons.
Would it be a good idea to add a table of weapons that can cause the fire status? It'd look a lot better than just putting them in the article. Chronohawk; 00:31, 21 November 2011 (PST)
Flame / Flames redirect?
I was just trying another desperate attempt to improve the wiki a little. I thought; Would it be a good idea to make Flame / Flames redirect here instead of redirecting to Projectiles? --Stevieboy753 11:36, 6 February 2012 (PST)
- Done Thanks for pointing that out. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 13:47, 6 February 2012 (PST)
Armageddon?
I've never actually managed to hit 2 or more players with Armageddon taunt, but, if I understand correctly, it does fire damage and can ignite players. If it's true, shouldn't it be added here? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by ShooterAndy (talk) • (contribs)
- Yes. Armageddon's kill icon is already in the gallery, too. -FlaminSarge 11:41, 3 August 2012 (PDT)
Unused Animations
I was looking through film maker, and found that the classes has death animations for "burning", these appear as if they're supposed to be used for afterburn deaths, but were never put in. Should this be labled as unused content?
TheDude 18:22, 22 October 2012 (PDT)
Extinguishing glitch?
Sometimes when I go to puff-and-sting an enemy, they're mysteriously extinguished after I airblast them. I'm not sure if it's due to the airblast itself or if it's on its own, but has anyone experienced this? Dry Paratroopa (talk) 21:47, 20 July 2013 (PDT)
- An airblast will only extinguish allies. Is this by any chance only happening with enemy Demomen? Remember the Chargin' Targe has been updated and now negates afterburn. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 11:27, 21 July 2013 (PDT)
- The extinguishing enemies part would be the glitch, of course. Now that you mention it, it has been happening with Demomen a lot, but I know that it's happened with enemy Medics at least once. I'll see if I can't make a Replay to prove it. Dry Paratroopa (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2013 (PDT)
Powerjack Error
The Powerjack has a green plus next to the statement 20% "damage vulnerability from all sources on wearer.", even though that is clearly a negative effect. XHoovy (talk) 17:45, 2 October 2013 (PDT)
- Fixed, thanks. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 17:52, 2 October 2013 (PDT)
Marked for Deletion?
There's a random marked for deletion notice in the middle of the article's intro. It says to see the discussion page, but I'm not seeing anything here about that. Any idea what it's about? Cosentino (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2017 (PDT)
- Thanks for catching that. Someone improperly put that on the template for the console commands text. It is now fixed. || twolfe's page || twolfe's talk page 05:20, 2 May 2017 (PDT)